Solutions — instrument
Singapore asks you to define the objective yourself.
Fairness, Ethics, Accountability and Transparency. Principles-based by design — a firm defines and justifies its own fairness objective — which is why RotaGrant's Singapore profile selects no clause map, and says so on the readiness screen rather than inventing one.
Why an empty selection is the right answer
A regime with no enumerable clauses cannot be scored against clauses. The Singapore profile therefore selects no instrument, and the readiness screen reports that as the regime's position rather than as a gap — because a 0% would read as a failing grade in an exam nobody sat.
The fairness objective is yours
FEAT expects a firm to state its own objective and justify it. The platform screens over attributes a subject declared, reports undisclosed rather than inferring, and suppresses a cohort too small to measure instead of reporting a rate it cannot support.
observed →Accountability is structural
Named ownership, a second approver above a threshold, and refusals recorded with their cause — the artefacts an internal audit would ask for, produced whether or not anybody asks.
observed →The Singapore identifier packs are active
NRIC and UEN detection is jurisdiction-resolved, and the PDPC treats the NRIC as unusually sensitive — an organisation may not collect or retain one except where the law requires it. Finding one is therefore a finding in itself.
observed →RotaGrant ships no clause map for MAS FEAT. The engine takes clause maps as data, so one can be authored — by you, by your counsel, or with us — and it will be scored like any other. What this page will not do is imply a mapping that does not exist, because a readiness percentage against an instrument nobody encoded is a number with no denominator.